|
|
The Quantum
Revolution
The real revolution in twentieth-century science is that of quantum
physics
After all else has been duly recognized and credited,
it was finally in the submicroscopic interstices of the atomrather
than in the telescopic reaches of outer space or the macroscopic
world of everyday experiencethat the primary postulates and
necessary truths of the Newtonian cosmology were one
by one brought under critical scrutiny, and one by one found wanting.
Although
the quantum theory was originally formulated by Max Planck at the
turn of the century, its startling hypothesisthat energy is
emitted not in the continuous stream of common supposition but in
discontinuous packets or quanta was only gradually and grudgingly
acknowledged by his fellow physicists. The reason was not simply,
as in the case of Maxwell, that the quantum of energy resisted representation
in terms of a mechanical model; more disturbingly, its assertion
of discontinuity at the bottom of things rudely violated the cardinal
faith of modern science in the uniformity and continuity of nature
specifically, its belief that the evolution of every self-contained
physical system is constituted by a continuous chain of causally
related events. Only after Plancks
constant and its theoretical underpinning had proved successful
in a number of physical applicationsmost notably in Einsteins
extension of the principle to all forms of radiant energy through
the establishment of the photoelectric effectwas the new conception
fully accepted as a fundamental law of physical science.
The extent
of the revolution which this discovery ushered in is suggested by
the observation of de Broglie that, on the day when quanta,
surreptitiously, were introduced the vast and grandiose edifice
of classical physics found itself shaken to its very foundations.
In the history of the intellectual world there have been few upheavals
comparable to this.
Through the
next half-century the quantum theory steadily made its way into
nearly every department of physical science. In addition to Einsteins
Nobel Prize-winning researches, the principle found a variety of
fruitful applications in chemistry, it shed light upon the
Third Law of Thermodynamics; it modified the kinetic theory
of gases; it was (most significantly of all) applied by Bohr to
explain the structure of atoms, and later by Dirac in his prediction
of the positron. Even Maxwells equations underwent reappraisal
in an effort to adjust them to the new ideas.
More recently,
there have been public suggestions that space itself
may be found to adhere to the quantum principlea conception
whose reverberations may conceivably outdistance all previous extensions
of the theory. In short, as one historian summarizes,
optics, mechanics, thermodynamics, chemistry, the statistical
laws, and many others have one by one come under the sway of the
quantum theory. Needless to say, our entire outlook on the physical
world has been affected.
The hypothesis
of energy radiation as finite and discontinuous, which was central
to the quantum theory from the beginning, shook the confidence of
scientists in the order and continuity of natural processes. But
it was not until 1913 that the first major offensive of quantum
physics against the traditional cosmologynamely, its attack
upon the deterministic conception of physical causalitywas
launched with the publication of Niels Bohrs theory of the
atom, which demonstrated that the entire internal organization of
matter rests upon the existence of quanta.
Bohrs
atom represented the most complete break with classical physics
yet accomplished, and, through its hypothesis of the unpredictability
of individual atomic events, provided the first set of arguments
in favour of indeterminism in the fundamental operations of
nature. Later experiments led to the displacement of Bohrs
pioneer theory, but the rupture with traditional mechanics which
it had signalled, far from being repaired, was progressively widened
and reinforced in the subsequent development of quantum physicsnot
least of all through the creative contributions of Bohr himself.
|
|
|